develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2003

Re: Perl performance benchmark?

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
May 20, 2003 03:54
Subject:
Re: Perl performance benchmark?
Message ID:
20030520115440.Z1149@plum.flirble.org
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 11:13:37PM +0100, Alan Burlison wrote:
> Someone internal to Sun wants to look at the performance of Perl to see if 
> there is anything we can do to make it go faster on Solaris by tweaking the 
> OS.  He was asking me if there were any recommended performance benchmarks 
> for Perl.  I'm aware of perlbench, but according to the REDADME that doesn't 
> support -Duseshrplib on anything except OS2.  Is that still the best choice?

Finding a useful benchmark seems to be a holy grail. perlbench produces
pretty numbers, but they've not been showing any change in areas where
specific changes have been made that produced real performance improvements
in production code. So I'm not convinced that it's useful.

The best thing that I can think of offhand is to take some batch-able
(hence repeatable) application program(s) and test them. I'm told
spamassassin is (a) a real resource hog and (b) something that even
die-hard perl haters will install /usr/bin/perl in order to run.
Would testing using spam assassin with a known fixed spam corpus
provide a suitable benchmark?

It may not make all perl scripts go faster, but it would probably make
quite a lot of real world perl users happy.

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About