Andy Dougherty wrote: >>Another related question: I've been having a parallel conversation with our >>libm folks about this issue, and they tell me that Solaris 10 will have both >>/usr/lib/libm.so.1 and /usr/lib/libm.so.2. Will Configure scan the correct >>version when two are present, i.e. /usr/lib/libm.so.2? > > Yes, it should. There's a messy sed command in that part of Configure to > sort library version numbers for just this sort of issue. Is there any part of Configure that *isn't* messy? I can feel my neurons expiring by the million every time I look at it... ;-) > However, if we're going to skip the nm scan on Solaris anyway, then > presumably the linker will do the right thing when handed -lm. It will - but see my patch. -- Alan Burlison --Thread Previous | Thread Next