Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from May 2003
On måndag, maj 12, 2003, at 09:43 Europe/Stockholm, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > > So long as the name of the define and the sense of the #ifn?def > make sense. > >> So the functionality is here unless we want to build a perl tailored >> for compilation speed (CGI applications come to mind.) > > For various devious reasons related to selecting versions of modules > I often have lots of things in @INC - the extra (futile) attempts to > open .pmc slows things down even more. > >> >> Or do we really want to kill .pmc files ? That somehow implies >> some lack of support for B::Bytecode. (not untrue.) > > Until bytecode loads faster than or is smaller than the .pm file I > fail to > see the point in it. It does not even hide much now that Deparse is so > good. > > Why hide it? I say keep it so people are encouraged to work on ByteCode or perhaps remove it and put it on the todo that ByteCodeloader should be implemented as a coderef in INC ArthurThread Previous | Thread Next