Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 19462 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu)

Op een zonnige lentedag (Saturday 10 May 2003 14:47), schreef Abe Timmerman:

> Automated smoke report for 5.9.0 patch 19462 on openbsd - 3.2 (i386/1 cpu)
> (ayla.local) using ccache egcc version 3.2
> Report generated by Test::Smoke v1.17
>
> O = OK  F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
> ? = still running or test results not (yet) available
> Build failures during:       - = unknown or N/A
>     c = Configure, m = make, t = make test-prep
>
>    19462     Configuration (common) -Dcc='ccache egcc'
>                -Dcf_email=abe@ztreet.demon.nl
> ------------ ------------------------------------------------------------
> O - O -      -Uuseperlio
> O F O F
> O F O F      -Duse64bitint
> O F O F      -Duseithreads
> O F O F      -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
> O - O -      -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE' -Uuseperlio
> O F O F      -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE'
> O F O F      -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE' -Duse64bitint
> O F O F      -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE' -Duseithreads
> O F O F      -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE' -Duseithreads -Duse64bitint
> | | | +----- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
> | | +------- PERLIO = stdio  -DDEBUGGING
> | +--------- PERLIO = perlio
> +----------- PERLIO = stdio
[snip]
> openbsd     [perlio      ]-DDEBUGGING -Dcc='ccache egcc'
>               (cont) -Dcf_email=abe@ztreet.demon.nl
>               (cont) -Accflags='-DPERL_COPY_ON_WRITE' -Duseithreads
>               (cont) -Duse64bitint
>     ext/Socket/socketpair................FAILED at test 12
> ../ext/Socket/socketpair....dubiousD. FAILED test 12

~/bleadperl/perl-current/t$ PERLIO=perlio ./perl harness -v ../ext/Socket/socketpair.t
../ext/Socket/socketpair....1..45
[snip]
ok 11 - right is at EOF
not ok 12 - and $! should report no error
#     Failed test (../ext/Socket/socketpair.t at line 127)
#          got: 'Bad file descriptor'
#     expected: ''
ok 13 - syswrite to shutdown left should fail

Good luck,

Abe
-- 
Adding a -w warning for the "pseudohashes are going away, repent and
give away your all wordly possessions" to 5.8.1 is okay, but what I
don't understand is why Sarathy is thinking people would be using -w
that much more than they would be reading the 5.8.0 announcement? :-)
                                   -- Jarkko Hietaniemi on p5p @ 2002-09-06

• Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 19462 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu) by Abe Timmerman