Re: Encode-1.92 was not marged right [Was: Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm]

> So I don't think it's a good idea to play ping-pong with that
> 'close STDOUT'.
> That sordide bug will be probably fixed in FreeBSD 5.1, but it seems
> to be there in FreeBSD 4.8, which is a stable release.
> 
> Until then, (sorry for repeating)
> close STDOUT unless $^O eq 'freebsd';

ping #19304 pong #19305 ...

> Regards
> Adi

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

• FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm by Dan Kogai
• Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm by Enache Adrian
• Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm by Dan Kogai
• Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm by Enache Adrian
• Encode-1.92 was not marged right [Was: Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm] by Dan Kogai
• Re: Encode-1.92 was not marged right [Was: Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm] by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: Encode-1.92 was not marged right [Was: Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm] by Enache Adrian
• Re: Encode-1.92 was not marged right [Was: Re: FreeBSD thread vs. encoding.pm] by Jarkko Hietaniemi