develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2003

Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 19262 FAIL(Fm) aix 5.1.0.0 (aix/1 cpu)

Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
April 19, 2003 03:05
Subject:
Re: Smoke [5.9.0] 19262 FAIL(Fm) aix 5.1.0.0 (aix/1 cpu)
Message ID:
20030419100144.GA284@Bagpuss.unfortu.net
On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 11:16:07PM +0200, Campo Weijerman wrote:
> Automated smoke report for 5.9.0 patch 19262 on aix - 5.1.0.0 (aix/1 cpu)
>           v1.16_21      using cc_r version 6.0.0.2
> O = OK
> F = Failure(s), extended report at the bottom
> ? = still running or test results not (yet) available
> Build failures during:       - = unknown
>     c = Configure, m = make, t = make test-prep
> 
>    19262     Configuration (common) none
> ------------ ----------------------------------------------------------------
> O O O O
> O O O O      -Duse64bitall
> F F F F      -Duse64bitall -Duselongdouble
> m m O O      -Duseithreads
> O O O O      -Duseithreads -Duse64bitall
> F F F F      -Duseithreads -Duse64bitall -Duselongdouble
> | | | +----- PERLIO = perlio -DDEBUGGING
> | | +------- PERLIO = stdio  -DDEBUGGING
> | +--------- PERLIO = perlio
> +----------- PERLIO = stdio
> 
> Summary: FAIL(Fm)
> 
> 
> Failures:
> 
> aix         [stdio       ]-Duse64bitall -Duselongdouble
> PERLIO = stdio	    t/base/num...........................FAILED at test 41
> ../t/base/num....FAILED test 41

$a = 0.; "$a";
print $a eq "0"       ? "ok 41\n" : "not ok 41 # $a\n";


Have these only recently started failing? (Changes were made to the long
double configuration code recently)

Can you send the output of running ./perl t/base/num.t by hand?  I think
that there should be some diagnostic output.

Nicholas Clark

Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About