develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2003

Re: [perl #21347] segfault in UNIVERSAL::AUTOLOAD

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Nicholas Clark
April 6, 2003 14:39
Re: [perl #21347] segfault in UNIVERSAL::AUTOLOAD
Message ID:
On Thu, Apr 03, 2003 at 01:58:56AM +0300, Enache Adrian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:21:43AM +0200, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:

> > OK, I don't like this idea of a new t/run/crash.t.
> > I'd put them in t/op/ref.t; or, at least, if you want a new test
> > file, "t/op/cleanup.t" ("test for global cleanups") feels better.
> I have no naming policy objections. Notice however that's not just
> final cleanup - there are many coredump cases, where putting the
> test at the end of a bigger script will make it just work fine -
> because that's how malloc(3) works in many cases - it will get
> a bigger memory chunk than asked, etc.
> ( the recent [perl #21728], for instance )

Do most of these tests crash correctly (prior to bugfix) if run in a new
perl using the runperl function in ?

Nicholas Clark

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About