Re: [unPATCH] Re: Smoke [5.8.1] 19076 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu)

Thanks, unAPPLIED (change #19081).

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

• RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be unde fined) by Robin Barker
• RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be und efined) by Robin Barker
• [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by hv
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by John Peacock
• Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined by hv
• [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by hv
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Rafael Garcia-Suarez
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be undefined) by Dave Mitchell
• [unPATCH] Re: Smoke [5.8.1] 19076 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu) by Nicholas Clark
• Re: [unPATCH] Re: Smoke [5.8.1] 19076 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu) by Dave Mitchell
• Re: [unPATCH] Re: Smoke [5.8.1] 19076 FAIL(F) openbsd 3.2 (i386/1 cpu) by Jarkko Hietaniemi