On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 04:40:22PM +0000, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > <schwern@pobox.com> writes: > >On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:54:22PM +0000, Tim Bunce wrote: > >> > > The current code isn't broken. It might not meet your aesthetic values, but > >> > > it's not broken. > > I am in catchup mode - but this thread "had" been going on for a while > and nobody "had" asked "Will this make Exporter even slower?" Will it make exporting use less memory? IIRC Ilya said that POSIX.pm uses huge amounts of memory in the structures it generates for Exporter. Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next