Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.)

Craig Berry wrote:

!To really stress test this with multiple threads going after the same
!directory stream I'd need an SMP machine to test on, which I don't have.
!But I think we are at least somewhat safer than we were before.

Can you specify which thread option to configure.com to use?
Also: has anyone made a tar ball out of maintperl@19035
(or something later that incorporates your patch) that is
accessible via either anon ftp or http?  I could give it
a try on an SMP machine.  Is there any ad hoc testing to
try?

Peter Prymmer

• [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by A . Bergman
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by A . Bergman
• [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Subject: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry