Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.

On fredag, mar 14, 2003, at 04:38 Europe/Stockholm, Craig A. Berry 
wrote:

>
> -- removed false impression that we support readdir_r in threaded
> builds. The C run-time supports it but we are using a home-grown 
> version
> of readdir.
>
>

Can the home-grown version be made threadsafe? Is it threadsafe? (Does 
anyone care?)

Arthur

• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry
• [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by PPrymmer
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by A . Bergman
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by A . Bergman
• [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by H.Merijn Brand
• Re: [PATCH] readdir_r for VMS (was Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc.) by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Subject: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Gurusamy Sarathy
• Re: [PATCH] configure.com: sig_num, etc. by Craig A. Berry