develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2003

Re: PROPOSAL: my $x if $false; and lexical initialisation

Thread Previous | Thread Next
Gurusamy Sarathy
March 1, 2003 16:30
Re: PROPOSAL: my $x if $false; and lexical initialisation
Message ID:
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 19:42:04 GMT, Dave Mitchell wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 11:19:52AM -0800, Gurusamy Sarathy wrote:
>> I'm not sure nextstate is the best place for this.  Since this is
>> only needed once per scope, checking for it once-per-statement
>> seems like wasted cycles.
>> Why not do it in the OP_LEAVE* ops?  Or perhaps even introduce
>> a new OP_LEAVEMY that only fires if there are lexicals that
>> need to be finalized in that scope.
>A problem with an OP_LEAVEMY is that it often won't get called, eg

Good point.  Might make more sense to make the OP_ENTER* ops
push savestack entries in block_end().

>Is there a way of ensuring that the op is always called no matter how the
>scope is unwound?

Not that I know of.

>Another option would be to insert an OP_STARTMY after each nextstate
>that preceeeded a my declaration ???

Seems kludgey for the cases where there is no nextstate preceding
the padsv.

Another way to approach it is to separate out the OP_PAD?V ops
and move them to execute at the beginning of the statement, sort
of as a preamble.  This means transforming:

    my ($x, $y) = ("xxx") if $z;

into the approximate equivalent of:

    my ($x, $y), (($x, $y) = ("xxx") if $z);

(except that $x and $y have already been resolved as lexicals
when the succeeding ops are compiled).

It also means that this:

    my $x if $bool;

would transform to:

    my $x, ($x if $bool);

and could be optimized into:

    my $x;


Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About