hv@crypt.org wrote: > It seems like it might be helpful at some point to be able to add > other Regexp:: methods - for introspection, for example, or even > as a window to enable or disable particular types of optimisation. > > I'd even be tempted to document it, though that may be too radical > a step. Yes, but HASH, ARRAY etc. are not classes ? On the other hand I don't know about the history behind the "Regexp" name, so my advice should not be assumed informed here --.Thread Previous | Thread Next