--- Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@free.fr> wrote: > hv@crypt.org wrote: > > > > I note also that the -A switch handling does a > forbid_setid("-A"). > > Any particular reason why it does that? I'd have thought that in > > general a script would be expected to run more safely with -A, so > > that it should positively be encouraged. > > I imagined that's because you can pass code to be executed via -A > to the regexp. E.g. via a nasty PERL5OPT. I was playing on the safe side, but anyway, I think that if a programmer wants to leave assertions active on a script to be used on taint mode it should explicitely use 'assertions::activate' at the beginning of the script instead of letting assertions being selected from the outside. Bye, - Salva