=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Salvador_Fandi=F1o?= <sfandino@yahoo.com> wrote: : > Is there any particular reason to have the code of : > assertions::activate in a separate package from assertions? : :To be able to have two different 'import' methods as both packages are :'use' based. But the assertions::activate is not normally directly used by anyone, but only implicitly by the -A switch, no? So it could as easily instead use a function called 'activate' in the assertions package, I would have thought. Hugo