develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2003

Re:

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
February 17, 2003 12:02
Subject:
Re:
Message ID:
20030217200215.GO16373@kosh.hut.fi
> I agree, although we seem to have problems avoiding core dumps
> 
> 1: in the regexp engine, due to deep C recursion blowing C's stack
> 2: modifying an array for() is iterating over, due to lack of refcounting.
>    Consensus seems to be that it's an unacceptable speed hit to refcount.
>    Problem seems to be that there are subtle ways to indirectly modify the
>    iteration list when it's syntactically a list, but contains an array

3. deleting symbol tables, especially main::, leads into situations not
   unlike a sub torpedoing itself

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About