develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2003

Re: How about gcc -funsigned-char [Was: Re: one signedness nit fo r Encode]

From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
February 17, 2003 05:55
Subject:
Re: How about gcc -funsigned-char [Was: Re: one signedness nit fo r Encode]
Message ID:
20030217135452.GA11646@kosh.hut.fi
> I agree with you that people such be $#@!  explicit about the
> signedness of their chars, based on my limited experience :-)

Make that declare as 'char' or 'unsigned char' and (cast) as
appropriate.  Spelling 'signed char' out in full looks messy.

-- 
Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special
biologist word we use for 'stable'.  It is 'dead'." -- Jack Cohen

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About