develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2003

RE: How about gcc -funsigned-char [Was: Re: one signedness nit fo r Encode]

From:
Horsley Tom
Date:
February 17, 2003 04:26
Subject:
RE: How about gcc -funsigned-char [Was: Re: one signedness nit fo r Encode]
Message ID:
F5573A841216B94CB3CD1A7A0A1FD35612E5CD@exchange.ccur.com
> The good thing is that very rarely (well, at least in my experience)

That just proves you have very limited experience :-). In C the
type "char" is basically just an int - why should it be the only
kind of int you have to do something special to get signed?

If unsigned char's make more sense, then $#@! declare them that way :-).



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About