Re: [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?)

Slaven Rezic wrote:
[snip]
> +           sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, &set, NULL);
> +#endif /* HAS_SIGPROCMASK */
>             (*PL_sighandlerp)(sig);
> +#if defined(HAS_SIGPROCMASK) && defined(PERL_BLOCK_SIGNALS)
> +           sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, &set, NULL);
> +#endif /* HAS_SIGPROCMASK */

Does this SIG_UNBLOCK code get called if (*PL_sighandlerp)(sig) die()s?


-- 
"So, who beat the clueless idiot today?"
"Well, we flipped for it, but when Kuno
 landed, he wasn't in any shape to fight."
"Next time, try flipping a *coin.*"

• [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?) by perlbug-followup
• Re: [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?) by Slaven Rezic
• Re: [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?) by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?) by Benjamin Goldberg
• Re: [perl #20920] Segmentation fault ("Safe Signal" queue problem?) by Slaven Rezic