develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2003

Re: perldebug.pod suggestion

Thread Previous
February 9, 2003 18:28
Re: perldebug.pod suggestion
Message ID:
"Jay Hannah" <> wrote:
:> From: Joe McMahon []
:> I don't want to say "don't document it" because it is useful, but I'm 
:> not sure we want this to be the way that you do this operation from now 
:> on. You might want to add a statement to the effect of "@DB::typeahead 
:> is not a supported interface and is subject to change in future 
:> releases". This lets us document it  but not get stuck with it 
:> permanently.
:Agreed. Below is a new patch.

Thanks, applied to the development sources as change #18683.

:> In any case, this certainly needs to go on the list of "features the 
:> debugger should oughta have when we make it better".
:Is there any way I can/should help with that? Is there anything else
:I can/should do at this point?

Joe is the man to talk to about that.

:(Is there a reasonable chance my patch will be applied?)

Once the pumpkin gets his head out of the daytime job, yes.
Apologies for the delay,


Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About