develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from February 2003

Re: Report 18637

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
H.Merijn Brand
Date:
February 5, 2003 03:54
Subject:
Re: Report 18637
Message ID:
20030205125007.0C58.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl
On Tue 04 Feb 2003 18:13, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <raphel.garcia-suarez@hexaflux.com> wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, have you a PA-RISC 2.0 among your HP-UX machines ?

Both are PA-RISC 2.0, but the 10.20 system builds with +DAportable in cc and
-mpa-risc-1-1 in gcc to be able to port my perl's to customers on 1.1 systems.

I will get a dual pa-risc-2.0 CPU 11.00 within two weeks, and I hope to extend
the matrix with it.

> (and by the way, do you know whether someone succeeded in compiling DBD::Oracle
> on a PA-RISC 2.0 ? I don't see a reason why the procedure should be different
> than for 1.1, but I haven't tried, we haven't a PA-RISC 2.0 -- yet)

I have, on all my machines :) [ Cygwin excluded, because I have no Oracle on
Win32 ]

-- 
H.Merijn Brand        Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.8.0 & 633 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
  WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11.  Smoking perl CORE: smokers@perl.org
http://archives.develooper.com/daily-build@perl.org/   perl-qa@perl.org
send smoke reports to: smokers-reports@perl.org, QA: http://qa.perl.org



Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About