develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2003

Re: [PATCH] Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d

From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
January 26, 2003 15:01
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d
Message ID:
20030126230136.J98340@plum.flirble.org
On Mon, Jan 27, 2003 at 12:46:51AM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
> > > Their head is rolling in 5.10.  In the 5.8 series we can't.
> > 
> > Is there anything stopping them coming out of blead today?
> 
> Backward compat.  We declared them deprecated at 5.8.0.  Therefore
> they can't be gone at 5.8.1.
> 
> > That would let us see what perlbench (and the vapourware reliable benchmark)
> > thinks the speedup is.
> 
> The patch is there, somewhere, blead's got it, anyone is free to
> apply it to maint.

D'oh. I thought that they hadn't gone from blead yet. They have:

[ 17725] By: hv                                    on 2002/08/17  00:51:19
        Log: Subject: [PATCH] Remove pseudo-hashes (complete)
             From: Michael G Schwern <schwern@pobox.com>
             Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:05:10 -0700 (21:05 BST)
             Message-id: <20020806200510.GC31473@ool-18b93024.dyn.optonline.net>
     Branch: perl
           ! av.c doop.c dump.c embed.fnc embed.h ext/B/B/Concise.pm
           ! global.sym lib/fields.pm lib/fields.t lib/overload.pm mg.c
           ! op.c op.h pod/perldiag.pod pod/perlfunc.pod pod/perlref.pod
           ! pp.c pp_hot.c proto.h t/op/avhv.t t/op/hashwarn.t

I need more sleep. (Probably better than more coffee)

5.005 threads are gone too from blead, aren't they?
So there's nothing big to come out :-(
Any speed improvements have to be found from new ideas?

Nicholas Clark



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About