> perlbench, that well known reputable supplier of reliable timing comparisons, Don't do that to me, my belly is hurting from laughing. > thinks that blead is only 14% slower than 5.004_05 (both compiled with the > same compiler and same options on the same machine) > > Can we kill pseudohashes yet? Their head is rolling in 5.10. In the 5.8 series we can't. -- Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next