On Sun, Jan 26, 2003 at 05:39:24PM +0200, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote: > > Surely any remaining differences are just general 5.6 -> 5.8 slowdown, > > which we're all familiar with? > > That we are familiar with it doesn't mean we should stay familiar with it :-) perlbench, that well known reputable supplier of reliable timing comparisons, thinks that blead is only 14% slower than 5.004_05 (both compiled with the same compiler and same options on the same machine) Can we kill pseudohashes yet? Nicholas ClarkThread Previous | Thread Next