develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2003

Re: [PATCH] Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d

From:
Nick Ing-Simmons
Date:
January 21, 2003 00:40
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d
Message ID:
20030121084017.1705.4@bactrian.elixent.com
<hv@crypt.org> writes:
>Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarez@free.fr> wrote:
>:Dave Mitchell wrote:
>:> If this is the case, we could steal the unused 0x10 bit of HINTS and
>:> use that to do the signalling, by appropriately modifying pp_dbstate() and
>:> Perl_magic_setdbline().
>:> 
>:> How does that sound as a plan?
>:
>:I approve. _Untested_ first shot :
>
>Sounds good to me. I think we should use 0x20 though, and let Arthur
>take 0x10 if he's prepared to come up with a name and patch for it.

/* #define HINT_notused10	0x00000010 */
				/* Note: 20,40,80 used for NATIVE_HINTS */
				/* currently defined by vms/vmsish.h */
So breaking VMS is okay?


>
>Hugo
-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/




nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About