Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2003
On måndag, jan 20, 2003, at 21:32 Europe/Stockholm, Dave Mitchell wrote: > > Or plan (b): > > OPf_SPECIAL doesn't seem to be used for OP_(DB|NEXT)STATE in op_flags, > so perhaps we could use that instead, and leave op_private purely for > hints? > > Of course, this still doesn't solve the problem (if indeed problem it > is), > of PUSHSUB() expecting PL_op to be an entersub or similar. > How come this asstertment isn't true anymore? Arthur