develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2003

Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Arthur Bergman
Date:
January 20, 2003 13:14
Subject:
Re: change #9754: 5 x slowdown for perl -d
Message ID:
273781EC-2CBC-11D7-A7B8-003065D64CBE@contiller.se

On måndag, jan 20, 2003, at 21:32 Europe/Stockholm, Dave Mitchell wrote:

>
> Or plan (b):
>
> OPf_SPECIAL doesn't seem to be used for OP_(DB|NEXT)STATE in op_flags,
> so perhaps we could use that instead, and leave op_private purely for
> hints?
>
> Of course, this still doesn't solve the problem (if indeed problem it 
> is),
> of PUSHSUB() expecting PL_op to be an entersub or similar.
>

How come this asstertment isn't true anymore?

Arthur
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About