develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2003

RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be und efined)

Robin Barker
January 20, 2003 03:59
RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be und efined)
Message ID:
It was me!  It is used with -DCHECK_FORMAT to do printf format checking.
See Porting/pumpkin.pod.


-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Ing-Simmons []
Sent: 19 January 2003 15:51
Cc:;; Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Subject: Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be

>I think Nick I-S did whatever magic is needed to make gcc argument
>it as a *printf format, 

I may have assisted but it wasn't me originally - GCC's __attribute__()
gives me a headache.

>and the fact that there's a warning probably means
>that I was wrong and you were right not to apply it. But I've not had
>to look yet.
>Nicholas Clark
Nick Ing-Simmons

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only.
If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or
disclose such information.

NPL Management Ltd cannot guarantee that the e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses.

NPL Management Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. No: 2937881
Registered Office: Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom TW11 0LW.
------------------------------------------------------------------- Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About