develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2003

RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be und efined)

Thread Previous
From:
Robin Barker
Date:
January 20, 2003 03:59
Subject:
RE: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be und efined)
Message ID:
533D273D4014D411AB1D00062938C4D904046295@hotel.npl.co.uk
It was me!  It is used with -DCHECK_FORMAT to do printf format checking.
See Porting/pumpkin.pod.

Robin

-----Original Message-----
From: Nick Ing-Simmons [mailto:nick@ing-simmons.net]
Sent: 19 January 2003 15:51
To: nick@unfortu.net
Cc: hv@crypt.org; perl5-porters@perl.org; Rafael Garcia-Suarez
Subject: Re: [PATCH] %_ (was Re: [PATCH] operation on `PL_na' may be
undefined)


[snip]
>
>I think Nick I-S did whatever magic is needed to make gcc argument
check
>it as a *printf format, 

I may have assisted but it wasn't me originally - GCC's __attribute__()
stuff
gives me a headache.

>and the fact that there's a warning probably means
>that I was wrong and you were right not to apply it. But I've not had
time
>to look yet.
>
>Nicholas Clark
-- 
Nick Ing-Simmons
http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/

-------------------------------------------------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or
privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only.
If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or
disclose such information.

NPL Management Ltd cannot guarantee that the e-mail or any
attachments are free from viruses.

NPL Management Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. No: 2937881
Registered Office: Teddington, Middlesex, United Kingdom TW11 0LW.
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About