develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2002

Re: Save a few hunderd kilobytes or a few hundred perl users?

From:
Jarkko Hietaniemi
Date:
May 1, 2002 11:29
Subject:
Re: Save a few hunderd kilobytes or a few hundred perl users?
Message ID:
20020501212904.F21317@alpha.hut.fi
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:39:07AM -0700, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> In article <20020501192458.Y21317@alpha.hut.fi>,
> Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@iki.fi> wrote:
> >Well, my understanding is that this is exactly what Mark is talking
> >about-- for the needs of the FreeBSD itself (build, pksrc?) they don't
> >need all of Perl.  For that miniperl or something like Debian's
> >perl-base where you don't start by leaving out what you don't need but
> >instead by taking in only what one absolutely needs.
> 
> But what is 'absolutely need'ed?  We should maintain a document in the

Why are you asking me...?  I'm the Bloat King :-)

> distribution that lists (or tries to, anyway) what under lib/ and ext/
> is actually an implicit or explicit part of the Perl language.  I'm
> thinking of all the pragmas as well as things like Errno that are
> implicitly loaded.  PerlIO/*.  AnyDBM_File and at least SDBM_File.
> Config.  What else?
> 
> (Note that I'm thinking of Debian's perl-base now, and other OS's that
> go that route, not FreeBSD's build needs.)

-- 
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
        # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
        # It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen



nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About