Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from December 2001
Re: Solaris longdouble pack.t failures
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
December 3, 2001 17:07
Subject:
Re: Solaris longdouble pack.t failures
Message ID:
20011204010755.F21702@plum.flirble.org
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:50:23PM -0500, Andy Dougherty wrote:
> Solaris 8 with -Duse64bitall -Duselongdouble gave me the following errors
> in op/pack.t:
>
> not ok 99 # For list (-128, -1, 0, 1, 127) (total -1) packed with c unpack '%65c' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 139 # For list (-32768, -1, 0, 1, 32767) (total -1) packed with s unpack '%65s' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 179 # For list (-2147483648, -1, 0, 1, 2147483647) (total -1) packed with i unpack '%65i' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 219 # For list (-2147483648, -1, 0, 1, 2147483647) (total -1) packed with l unpack '%65l' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 259 # For list (-32768, -1, 0, 1, 32767) (total -1) packed with s! unpack '%65s!' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 299 # For list (-2147483648, -1, 0, 1, 2147483647) (total -1) packed with i! unpack '%65i!' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 339 # For list (-2147483648, -1, 0, 1, 2147483647) (total -1) packed with l! unpack '%65l!' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 499 # For list (-9223372036854775808, -1, 0, 1, 9223372036854775807) (total -1) packed with q unpack '%65q' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
> not ok 519 # For list (0, 1, 9223372036854775807, 9223372036854775808, 18446744073709551615) (total 36893488147419103231) packed with Q unpack '%65Q' gave 0, expected 36893488147419103231
>
> Do these look familiar to anyone?
Yes. perl doesn't find a long double modf, does it?
[does your other message that I've just deleted solve that one?]
Nicholas Clark
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next