develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2001

Re: Report /pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current@11789

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Arthur Bergman
Date:
August 30, 2001 06:39
Subject:
Re: Report /pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-current@11789
Message ID:
B7B40E82.36AB%arthur@contiller.se
01-08-30 15.24, skrev Arthur Bergman på arthur@contiller.se följande:

> 01-08-30 15.00, skrev H.Merijn Brand på h.m.brand@hccnet.nl följande:
> 
>> On Thu 30 Aug 2001 14:21, Arthur Bergman <arthur@contiller.se> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is this happening only under ithreads?
>>> 
>>> About when did you first see this segfault?
>> 
>> Who's talking about threads?
>> 
>> Default configuration on HP-UX 10.20 (-DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio)
>> at least a week now ...
>> 
>> 11471 was still building, but failed on these
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Uuseperlio
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Uuseperlio
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Duseperlio
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Uuseperlio -Dusethreads -Duseithreads
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Uuseperlio -Dusethreads
>> -Duseithreads
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Duseperlio -Dusethreads -Duseithreads
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Dusethreads
>> -Duseithreads
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble -Dusethreads
>> -Duseithreads
>> HP-UX 10.20  stdio/perlio     -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble
>> -Dusethreads -Duseithreads
>> lib/File/Find/find.................FAILED at test 189
>> lib/File/Find/taint................FAILED at test 29
>> 
>> 11722 started with all 'm's
>> I've got no reports from between maybe the archive has
>> 
>> <20010822144310.A7B2.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl> is the mail to Hugo where I
>> mentioned the core dump on 10.20, and knowing my own 'keeping' policy for
>> mail,
>> I think it is introduced in patches from between 11693 .. 11722, but even
>> more
>> likely 11712 .. 11722
>> 11720 and 11721 are *not* rsync available
>> 
>> 11712/11714 is a likely candidate pair.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Now, huh, we better look at 11712 and 11714, because I think they are
> responsible!
> 
> -- 
> Arthur

That would be 11717

-- 
Arthur


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About