01-08-30 15.00, skrev H.Merijn Brand på h.m.brand@hccnet.nl följande: > On Thu 30 Aug 2001 14:21, Arthur Bergman <arthur@contiller.se> wrote: >> >> Is this happening only under ithreads? >> >> About when did you first see this segfault? > > Who's talking about threads? > > Default configuration on HP-UX 10.20 (-DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio) > at least a week now ... > > 11471 was still building, but failed on these > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Uuseperlio > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Uuseperlio > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Duseperlio > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Uuseperlio -Dusethreads -Duseithreads > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Uuseperlio -Dusethreads > -Duseithreads > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Duseperlio -Dusethreads -Duseithreads > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Dusethreads > -Duseithreads > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble -Dusethreads > -Duseithreads > HP-UX 10.20 stdio/perlio -DDEBUGGING -Duseperlio -Duselongdouble > -Dusethreads -Duseithreads > lib/File/Find/find.................FAILED at test 189 > lib/File/Find/taint................FAILED at test 29 > > 11722 started with all 'm's > I've got no reports from between maybe the archive has > > <20010822144310.A7B2.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl> is the mail to Hugo where I > mentioned the core dump on 10.20, and knowing my own 'keeping' policy for > mail, > I think it is introduced in patches from between 11693 .. 11722, but even more > likely 11712 .. 11722 > 11720 and 11721 are *not* rsync available > > 11712/11714 is a likely candidate pair. Thanks! Now, huh, we better look at 11712 and 11714, because I think they are responsible! -- ArthurThread Previous | Thread Next