develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from August 2001

Re: The case for \.

Thread Previous
Nick Ing-Simmons
August 17, 2001 03:08
Re: The case for \.
Message ID:
Brent Dax <> writes:
>(Note that I am not necessarily advocating \. over other syntaxes--I'm fine 
>with forms such as \?.)
>Many people here who originally advocated \. seemed to be placated when the 
>"typeclass syntax" (for lack of a better term) was proposed.  They feel that 
>(\[$@%*&]) is just as good as (\.).
>*Come on!*
>Perl is all about streamlining programming, and one of the big ways it does 
>so is by providing shortcuts.  If \[$@%*&] is a common case, we should 
>provide a shortcut.

I don't think \[$@%*&] is a common case. If it was we would not have 
had prototypes for years and only just "needed it three times" to trigger
its addition.

Nick Ing-Simmons

Thread Previous Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About