Re: turning EXPR into sub { EXPR }

"Jeff 'japhy/Marillion' Pinyan" <jeffp@crusoe.net> wrote:
> Could someone lend me a hand in turning an expression (or specifically,
> the OP representing it) into an anonymous subroutine?
[snip]
>   o2 = newANONSUB(
>     start_subparse(FALSE, CVf_ANON),
>     Nullop,
>     block_end(block_start(TRUE), kid)
>   );

I don't see how that could work - start_subparse() must be called before
the block is parsed in order to set the correct scope for the manipulation
of lexicals within the block. In the code above, the block has already been
parsed by the time start_subparse() is called.

(But I could be wrong!)

Dave M.

• turning EXPR into sub { EXPR } by Jeff 'japhy/Marillion' Pinyan
• Re: turning EXPR into sub { EXPR } by Dave Mitchell
• Re: turning EXPR into sub { EXPR } by Jeff 'japhy/Marillion' Pinyan
• Re: turning EXPR into sub { EXPR } by Jeff 'japhy/Marillion' Pinyan