Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2001
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:46:04AM -0700, Simon Cozens wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 11:27:20AM +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> > > Since Unicode.txt is not sorted in dictionary order,
> > > e.g
> > > FFFD;REPLACEMENT CHARACTER;So;0;ON;;;;;N;;;;;
> > > 10300;OLD ITALIC LETTER A;Lo;0;L;;;;;N;;;;;
> > >
> > > then, a sorted file is necessary, isn't it?
> >
> > I don't know enough to answer this question. Others will, but many people
> > are at the perl conference at the moment so they may not be in a position
> > to read e-mail or reply this week.
>
> I don't *think* it's necessary, given that we're going to be putting it
> all in a hash anyway.
No, we are not putting it all in a hash, not in the sense of
cacheing/accumulating the charinfo() results.
I now extended Search::Dict so that it can do a little bit more with
its input stream, and that made having a sorted file unnecessary.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next