Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2001
Simon Cozens <simon@netthink.co.uk> writes: >On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:38:55AM -0700, Jeffrey Friedl wrote: >> As I and Scott have said, and to which you agreed, clamping and >> readonlyness are different animals. Shouldn't the way to invoke them, >> therefore, also be different? > >And I'll reiterate that if you want clamping, then Tie::SecureHash >does exactly what you're after. Except speed. Jeffrey's scheme trades a C level SvREADONLY(hv) (on all hash accesses) vs method despatch on "clamp-via-tie". > >Simon -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/Thread Previous | Thread Next