On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 10:38:55AM -0700, Jeffrey Friedl wrote: > As I and Scott have said, and to which you agreed, clamping and > readonlyness are different animals. Shouldn't the way to invoke them, > therefore, also be different? And I'll reiterate that if you want clamping, then Tie::SecureHash does exactly what you're after. SimonThread Previous | Thread Next