01-07-21 01.17, skrev Jeffrey Friedl på jfriedl@yahoo-inc.com följande: > Nick Ing-Simmons <nick@ing-simmons.net> wrote: > |> >(Which would be a nice feature as > |> >well, and even moreso, it would imply that we could then have readonly > |> >scalars.) > |> > |> We can already. > > Could you give me a pointer to where I might find more information about > this? Scalar::Util::readonly? I think extending SvREADONLY to hashes and arrays would be a good thing. -- ArthurThread Previous | Thread Next