Re: [PATCH] defer op_seq allocation

01-07-19 18.42, skrev Abhijit Menon-Sen på ams@wiw.org följande:

> In light of Arthur Bergman's recent "pad target under 5.7.2 ithreads,"
> however, I request that my old patch be applied as a temporary measure
> with the comments below (it passes all tests, and shouldn't break
> anything else).
> 
> I am investigating the problem again, and will try to get a real fix out
> as soon as I can.

Without it ithreads break terribly since we depend on Perl_peep to move
constants to the pad, one could change this I guess to make op_const
directly use the pad but clearly Perl_peep should be run.

Having tried to find this the last 4 days hasn't been very fun. Without the
patch POE doesn't work (as an example).

-- 
Arthur

• [PATCH] defer op_seq allocation by Abhijit Menon-Sen
• Re: [PATCH] defer op_seq allocation by Nick Ing-Simmons
• Re: [PATCH] defer op_seq allocation by Arthur Bergman