Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2001
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:54:12PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> > Well, at the very least they need to be declared, then. Otherwise the
> > atfork_lock and atfork_unlock are were not visible in miniperlmain.c.
>
> they are declared, but my patch put them in unixish.h, probably not the
*cough* Take a look at the patch you sent to perl5-porters.
For easy reference:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/mailing-lists/perl5-porters/2001-07/msg00687.html
> right place, perl.h would probably do.
> right, which keeping the original 'void Perl_fork_*(void)' prototype
> should cure with the ickyness.
Okay, retracting the bandaid.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next