Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2001
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 10:42:14PM -0700, Doug MacEachern wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Jarkko Hietaniemi wrote:
>
> > I had to patch as follows before I even got a compile.
> > After this it builds and tests 100% for me under ithreads?
>
> i don't see how the bandaid patch would cause that, all it did was
> un-staticize the atfork handlers and move the call to perlmain.c
Well, at the very least they need to be declared, then. Otherwise the
atfork_lock and atfork_unlock are were not visible in miniperlmain.c.
> can you run 'make perl.i' and see if THX is really needed in the atfork
> functions? if it is, i don't see how this patch will work since the
It works.
> pthread_atfork() handlers will not get passed any args. i think they
The function pointer typedef was admittedly a bit icky... but without
that part the Compaq C compiler get serious indigestion about mismatching
function signatures at pthread_atfork().
> would need to keep the (void) prototype and call dTHX; instead.
--
$jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/
# There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'.
# It is 'dead'. -- Jack Cohen
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next