On Fri, Jul 06, 2001 at 02:58:31PM +0200, Konovalov, Vadim Vladimirovich (Vadim) wrote: > > >This code *duplicates* the work already done in the CRTL, > > thus lead to > > >double translations (as easy examples show). > > > > That is NOT the intent. The intent is that crlf layer is used when: > > A. The OS CRTL does not do that (e.g. reading DOSISH files on UNIX). > > B. When the CRTL is buggy and inefficient (e.g. Borland and > > VC++ C on Win32). > > (speaking of layers in general) > C. To implement transparent pack/unpack/encode/crypt via something like PerlIO::gzip layer. > D. utf > There are probably more to add, by I'm not that knowledgable. > > I want to add that things became worse: I can't report a bug in the Borland CRT anymore :( > Looks like they've introduced something like chargeable bug support :(( That's insane if that means they will not even accept bug reports. You are doing them a service by telling their product is broken, and they want to charge you for that? Hey, you should be sending *them* a bill... (I could understand charging if there were a *support contract* of some sort in place, e.g. they promise to do something about a reported bug (e.g. a suppport engineer would answer, not necessarily *fix* the bug...) within some time limit.) Send bug reports from one-time anonymous hotmail accounts? :-) > And that bug makes perl compiled by Borland not to pass test suite ... > > Best wishes, > <!ENTITY Vadim REALLIFE "Vadim V.Konovalov, St.Petersburg, Russia"> > &Vadim; -- $jhi++; # http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ # There is this special biologist word we use for 'stable'. # It is 'dead'. -- Jack CohenThread Previous | Thread Next