01-07-05 15.04, skrev David M. Lloyd på dmlloyd@tds.net följande: > On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Benjamin Stuhl wrote: > >>> I have written an XS interface into a library that performs I/O and >>> then can asynchronously call a C function upon completion. Is there a >>> SAFE way I can reflect an asynchronous callback into Perl? >> >> AFAIK, only if the perl is built to expect such. In 5.8.0-to-be there >> is the PERL_ASYNC_CHECK which is used for safe signals. You would have >> to hack around a bit in the core to interface that to your XS, and >> even then it would only work with a perl built for it. >> >> Maybe 5.8.0 should make PL_signal_pending or whatever it's called >> public and provide a way for modules to register a event-checking >> callback? > > I can't help but be jealous of PHP/Zend in this respect. I have a friend > who just wrote a signal handling *add-on* module (that is, there was no > hacking required of the core engine) because he was able to use an API > function to insert a C callback that is called between every opcode (or > whatever they call them... I think they have a subtly different name for > the same concept). > > It would be awesome to have something like that in Perl. I guess that the > performance hit associated with such a callback would be minimal... well > worth the added power. > > - D Like Benjamin said, we have PERL_ASYNC_CHECK that checks between opcodes, this could added as a option to that. How hard would it be for PERL_ASYNC_CHECK to call a C callback instead of a perl signal handler? And if that C callback did call_sv()... ArturThread Previous | Thread Next