[PATCH] Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now

On Mon 02 Jul 2001 13:12, Dave Mitchell <davem@fdgroup.co.uk> wrote:
> > > -#ifdef DEGUGGING
> > > +//vv #ifdef DEGUGGING
> 
> and what's a GUG, anyway ... ?

l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-5.7.1 105 > agrep -2 DEBUGGING *.[ch] | grep -v DEBUGGING
gv.c: #ifdef DEGUGGING
l1:/pro/3gl/CPAN/perl-5.7.1 106 >

--- gv.c    Sun Jul  1 00:04:54 2001
+++ gv.c    Mon Jul  2 13:34:03 2001
@@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@
 #endif
   if (!(AMGf_noleft & flags) && SvAMAGIC(left)
       && (mg = mg_find((SV*)(
-#ifdef DEGUGGING
+#ifdef DEBUGGING
                             stash=
 #endif
                             SvSTASH(SvRV(left))),


-- 
H.Merijn Brand    Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 626 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
     WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.022 &/| DBD-Unify
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/

• gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Dave Mitchell
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• [PATCH] Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand