RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now

> > > -#ifdef DEGUGGING
> > > +//vv #ifdef DEGUGGING
> 
> and what's a GUG, anyway ... ?

you're right, someone just polluted source code with unusable lines of code.
Ok, here I've attached is a final solution then (q.txt) as I see it.

Anyway, it will be better if author of those lines will provide a correct fix.

Best wishes,
Vadim.

• gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Dave Mitchell
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• [PATCH] Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
• Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand