Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now - nntp.perl.org

Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2001

Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now

Thread Previous | Thread Next

From:

Dave Mitchell

Date:

July 2, 2001 04:12

Subject:

Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now

Message ID:

200107021112.MAA29468@gizmo.fdgroup.co.uk

> > -#ifdef DEGUGGING
> > +//vv #ifdef DEGUGGING

and what's a GUG, anyway ... ?

Thread Previous | Thread Next

gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov

Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Dave Mitchell

Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
[PATCH] Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand

RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
RE: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by vkonovalov
Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by Jarkko Hietaniemi
Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now by H . Merijn Brand

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About