develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from July 2001

Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now

Thread Previous
From:
H . Merijn Brand
Date:
July 2, 2001 04:01
Subject:
Re: gv.c is not acceptable for Borland now
Message ID:
20010702124829.499C.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl
On Mon 02 Jul 2001 12:22, "Konovalov, Vadim Vladimirovich (Vadim)" <vkonovalov@lucent.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> I've discovered that Borland C++ does not accepts a construct in gv.c (it explains that '#' is unexpected here, i.e. some preprocessor failure)
> 
> I've marked them as //vv in patch in order to build perl, but real patch must be smarter than this.

Why use C++ comment style? I'd expect almost any other non-C++ ANSI compiler
to choak on this. Please use /*...*/

> someone who wrote these lines, please change them in a more clever for other compilers way.
> 
> diff -u -r perl@11059-orig/gv.c perl@11059/gv.c
> --- perl@11059-orig/gv.c	Sun Jul  1 01:21:34 2001
> +++ perl@11059/gv.c	Mon Jul  2 10:13:14 2001
> @@ -1365,9 +1365,9 @@
>  #endif
>    if (!(AMGf_noleft & flags) && SvAMAGIC(left)
>        && (mg = mg_find((SV*)(
> -#ifdef DEGUGGING
> +//vv #ifdef DEGUGGING

-- 
H.Merijn Brand    Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 626 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
     WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.022 &/| DBD-Unify
ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/languages/perl/CPAN/authors/id/H/HM/HMBRAND/


Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About