Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2001
[PATCH] op/numconver.t
Thread Next
From:
Nicholas Clark
Date:
June 30, 2001 07:40
Subject:
[PATCH] op/numconver.t
Message ID:
20010630154010.I59620@plum.flirble.org
This patch adds comments explaining the reasons behind the allowed exceptions,
removes the VMS-naughty print "not " if ...; construction,
and closes one class of falsely allowed exceptions.
If I got the last bit right then any new "nok"s are real problems that were
being brushed under the carpet, and no correct longdouble, 64bitint
platforms will notice.
[Crays will now fail test 208, IIRC, which they were incorrectly passing
before. I don't yet know where the problem with Crays is.]
Nicholas Clark
--- t/op/numconvert.t.orig Fri Jan 12 05:49:38 2001
+++ t/op/numconvert.t Sat Jun 30 15:29:00 2001
@@ -204,20 +204,40 @@
print "# ok, as string ++ of max_uv is \"$max_uv_pp\", numeric is $max_uv_p1\n"
} elsif ($opnames[$last] eq 'I' and $ans[1] eq "-1"
and $ans[0] eq $max_uv_p1_as_iv) {
+ # Max UV plus 1 is NV. This NV may stringify in E notation.
+ # And the number of decimal digits shown in E notation will depend
+ # on the binary digits in the mantissa. And it may be that
+ # (say) 18446744073709551616 in E notation is truncated to
+ # (say) 1.8446744073709551e+19 (say) which gets converted back
+ # as 1.8446744073709551000e+19
+ # ie 18446744073709551000
+ # which isn't the integer we first had.
+ # But each step of conversion is correct. So it's not an error.
+ # (Only shows up for 64 bit UVs and NVs with 64 bit mantissas,
+ # and on Crays (64 bit integers, 48 bit mantissas) IIRC)
print "# ok, \"$max_uv_p1\" correctly converts to IV \"$max_uv_p1_as_iv\"\n";
} elsif ($opnames[$last] eq 'U' and $ans[1] eq ~0
and $ans[0] eq $max_uv_p1_as_uv) {
+ # as aboce
print "# ok, \"$max_uv_p1\" correctly converts to UV \"$max_uv_p1_as_uv\"\n";
} elsif (grep {/^N$/} @opnames[@{$curops[0]}]
- and $ans[0] == $ans[1] and $ans[0] <= ~0) {
+ and $ans[0] == $ans[1] and $ans[0] <= ~0
+ # First must be in E notation (ie not just digits) and
+ # second must still be an integer.
+ # I can't remember why there isn't symmetry in this
+ # exception, ie why only the first ops are tested for 'N'
+ and $ans[0] !~ /^-?\d+$/ and $ans[0] !~ /^-?\d+$/) {
print "# ok, numerically equal - notation changed due to adding zero\n";
} else {
$nok++,
}
}
}
- print "not " if $nok;
- print "ok $test\n";
+ if ($nok) {
+ print "not ok $test\n";
+ } else {
+ print "ok $test\n";
+ }
#print $txt if $nok;
$test++;
}
Thread Next
-
[PATCH] op/numconver.t
by Nicholas Clark