Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2001
Re: AIX / gcc-3.0
From: H . Merijn Brand
June 29, 2001 08:01
Re: AIX / gcc-3.0
Message ID: 20010629165343.9DC3.H.M.BRAND@hccnet.nl
On Fri 29 Jun 2001 16:40, Jens-Uwe Mager <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:54:42PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > On Fri 29 Jun 2001 15:46, Jens-Uwe Mager <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 03:01:07PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote:
> > > > > > There should be more research done, because gcc-3.0 for AIX does **NOT**
> > > > > > support the -brtl flag! So none of the gcc-3.0 configurations would succeed
> > > > > > anyway (probably also not in 4.3.3, but since I don't have that yet, I can't
> > > > > > tell for sure.
> > >
> > > Oh, I think for gcc this should be -Wl,-brtl instead of -brtl alone. This
> > > is a linker flag and not a compiler flag but unfortunately the gcc
> > > compiler driver does not know it.
> > Chage the hints then ;-)
> I have nowhere on my machines any gcc, and I do not intend to use it.
Neither do I, but I just can't resist the temptation. I wouldn't even /think/
about installing a gcc-built perl anywhere ...
> Compiling software with the IBM C compiler produces much faster objects.
> I thus would be ill advised to do such a patch if I cannot even test it.
Would this do?
--- hints/aix.sh Thu Jun 28 21:52:31 2001
+++ hints/aix.sh Fri Jun 29 16:11:59 2001
@@ -462,7 +470,7 @@
if test $usenativedlopen = 'true'
- ldflags="$ldflags -brtl"
+ ldflags="$ldflags -Wl,-brtl"
# If the C++ libraries, libC and libC_r, are available we will prefer them
# over the vanilla libc, because the libC contain loadAndInit() and
H.Merijn Brand Amsterdam Perl Mongers (http://www.amsterdam.pm.org/)
using perl-5.6.1, 5.7.1 & 626 on HP-UX 10.20 & 11.00, AIX 4.2, AIX 4.3,
WinNT 4, Win2K pro & WinCE 2.11 often with Tk800.022 &/| DBD-Unify