Renaming of :shared

I would like to suggest again that we rename : shared

It is missnamed since the variable isn't a shared variable between threads,
it is a read only shared variable between threads.

It should realy say : shared : readonly;

I am suggesting we name it static.

Do we realy want to explain over and over again that shared means it becomes
readonly, AND readonly AFTER the fork/new thread. That is a very obfuscated
behaviour.

Maybe it would be better to just have a :readonly; that makes it readonly on
first assigment and then is implicitly shared between threads? And it makes
it possible for a user to create something readonly?

Artur

• hello by bailey
• hello by gnat
• hello by rspier
• hello by domo
• hello by bailey
• hello by cwilson
• hello by nick
• hello by paul.green
• hello by jand
• hello by bailey
• hello by aml
• hello by eserte
• hello by neilb
• hello by larry
• Re: hello by Aronaxis
• Re: hello by Randy W. Sims
• hello by lionel.cons
• hello by pudge
• hello by gsar
• hello by pvhp
• Hello by larry
• Hello by gsar
• Hello by jhi
• Hello by gisle
• Hello by tom
• Hello by matt
• Hello by lstein
• Hello by raphael_manfredi
• HELLO by muir
• HELLO by bailey
• HELLO by dave
• HELLO by allen
• HELLO by tye
• Renaming of :shared by Artur Bergman
• Re: Renaming of :shared by Artur Bergman