On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:41:20PM +0100, Simon Cozens wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 01:30:35PM +0100, Graham Barr wrote: > > What is it that you think this is gaining ? > > I think that's not gaining anything, but it's losing a dependency on > Exporter, which is *way* overweight for UNIVERSAL. Sounds like a Good > Thing to me. But why is that good ? You are not making the process lighter as the probablility that another module will include Exporter is very high. Graham.Thread Previous | Thread Next